Get a Case Review

Many defendants, especially those accused of felony crimes or misdemeanor offenses, often ask if they can take a lie detector test as part of their defense. Polygraph tests, also known as lie detector tests, are controversial because experts disagree about their effectiveness. Although the majority of people do not take polygraph tests, there may be circumstances when a person who has been charged with or is under investigation for a crime may want to. If you are thinking about taking a lie detector test, it is important that you talk to an attorney who has experience working with polygraph examiners in the past and knows how best to handle this type of situation.

Lie detectors, or polygraphs, measure and record a person’s heart rate and blood pressure when that person is asked questions. The most commonly used lie detector tests in the United States are polygraphs. The theory behind a lie detector test is that the difference in physiological responses between lying and telling the truth can be measured. Because of this, the term ‘lie detector test’ is actually a misnomer. Instead of judging whether a given statement is true or false, the polygraph determines how nervous you are when making that statement—whether due to guilt or anxiety.
During a polygraph test, several sensors are attached to the person to record physiological signals such as breathing rate, pulse, blood pressure, perspiration, and sometimes arm and leg movement. These signals are recorded on a single strip of moving paper, allowing a polygraph examiner to analyze the person’s responses. The test typically begins with three or four simple questions to establish the person’s baseline signals. Then, the examiner asks the real questions being tested by the polygraph. Throughout the questioning process, the person’s signals are continually recorded on the moving paper. After the test, the polygraph examiner examines the recorded graphs to look for significant changes in vital signs during specific questions. These changes, such as a faster heart rate, higher blood pressure, or increased perspiration, are generally interpreted as indicators of potential deception. While a well-trained examiner can detect lying with a certain level of accuracy, it’s important to note that the examiner’s interpretation is subjective and can be influenced by individual differences in reactions to lying. Therefore, while polygraph tests can provide insights, they are not considered infallible and can be fooled.
Polygraph exams are administered by trained examiners for a fee. The cost of a lie detector test typically ranges between $200 to $2,000, with the specific cost increasing with the duration of the test. An all-day test will be on the high end of the cost range, while a typical two-hour exam can be expected to cost between $200 and $800.

The accuracy, or validity, of polygraph testing has been a subject of ongoing controversy. One fundamental issue is that there is no evidence to suggest that a specific pattern of physiological reactions is exclusive to deception. An honest individual may exhibit nervousness when answering truthfully, while a dishonest person may appear non-anxious. Furthermore, there is limited empirical support validating the effectiveness of polygraph procedures in detecting deception.

The confusion surrounding the accuracy of polygraph tests is further compounded by their varied usage, with different theories and research applied to each context. For instance, there is scarce research evaluating the efficacy of the specific tests and procedures used for screening job applicants and granting security clearances, as opposed to the more commonly studied specific incident testing. Consequently, it is generally not advisable to solely rely on the results of a polygraph test when making critical decisions.

Passing a lie detector test while lying in California, as in any other location, is theoretically possible due to the inherent limitations of polygraph tests. These tests measure physiological responses such as heart rate, blood pressure, and sweating, which are assumed to change under stress when a person lies. However, the accuracy of polygraph tests is widely debated, with some studies suggesting significant rates of both false positives and false negatives. Therefore, someone might manage to control their physiological responses or employ countermeasures to manipulate the results, potentially leading to a deceptive individual passing the test.

Unfortunately, innocent individuals can fail polygraph tests, even if they are telling the truth. This can occur if they experience stress or anxiety during the test, similar to guilty individuals. Additionally, misunderstandings or overanalysis of the questions asked by the polygraph examiner can lead to incorrect results. The polygraph machine measures changes in a person’s biology, such as blood pressure or perspiration, which can be misinterpreted as signs of lying when they are actually due to anxiety. The stressful nature of being connected to a lie detector machine can cause false positive results, falsely implicating innocent people. Therefore, it is important to consider the limitations and potential inaccuracies of polygraph tests, and not solely rely on their results in legal cases.

Yes, it is entirely possible for someone to pass a lie detector test while still being guilty. The fundamental reason for this is that lie detector tests, or polygraphs, do not measure truthfulness directly. Instead, they monitor physiological responses such as heart rate, respiration, and skin conductivity, which are assumed to fluctuate under stress associated with lying. However, these responses can vary for reasons unrelated to deception, such as nervousness or other emotional states. Additionally, some individuals might be able to suppress these responses through physical or mental techniques, effectively masking any signs of deceit. Therefore, the possibility exists for a guilty person to appear truthful in a polygraph test.
The duration required to receive results from a lie detector test can vary, but typically, results are available relatively quickly—often within the same day of testing. After the test is conducted, which itself can last from one to three hours, the polygraph examiner will analyze the data collected during the session. This analysis involves reviewing the physiological responses recorded and interpreting whether the responses suggest truthfulness or deception. The examiner may discuss preliminary results with the participant immediately after the session, followed by a more detailed report that can be prepared within a few hours to a day, depending on the complexity of the analysis and the specific protocols of the examiner or agency conducting the test.
In California, polygraph test results are typically not admissible in court unless all parties involved agree to their admission as evidence. This means that a polygraph test can only be used in court if the prosecution and defense both agree to its validity. It is important to note that law enforcement cannot compel a suspect or witness to undergo a polygraph test.
Nervousness can cause a person to fail a polygraph test, even if they are not lying. This is because nervousness can lead to increased blood pressure and heavy breathing, which the lie detector interprets as signs of deception. Unfortunately, the polygraph cannot distinguish between anxiety, nervousness, and lying, as it relies on the individual’s physiological responses to determine truthfulness. Therefore, being nervous can result in failing the test. However, experienced examiners can often recognize the difference between a person who is genuinely nervous and someone who is lying. They can take into account the individual’s behavior, demeanor, and responses to determine the truth. It is important to note that they may also consider other indicators of deception besides physiological responses. If you have a diagnosed medical condition such as anxiety, PTSD, ADHD, or bipolar disorder, it is advisable to inform the examiner before taking the polygraph test. This can help ensure that any physiological changes or reactions related to your condition are taken into consideration during the evaluation.

Although lie detector tests are unreliable and have no legal standing, law enforcement agencies continue to use them because they give investigators an advantage in interrogating suspects. while your rights suffer. There are many things that can cause a test result to be inaccurate. Therefore, you should never agree to take a polygraph test if you are being investigated or think that you may be suspected of committing a crime. Even if you know that you are innocent and pass the polygraph test, police can still find incriminating or embarrassing information about you. They may think you “passed” the test and continue their investigation. Instead of answering questions from the police, you should remain silent and contact a Los Angeles criminal defense lawyer.

At Tabibnia Law, we know the tactics used against the accused and have built our reputation on our ability to obtain favorable outcomes in high stakes criminal cases. Call us today for a free case evaluation.

Get A Case Review

    Please prove you are human by selecting the house.

    Excellent rating
    Based on 60 reviews
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    We are living abroad and had to help our relative with a difficult law case in the US. I am so glad that Cyrus Tabibnia represented us and solved our case perfectly!
    Gudrun Rapke-Brockert profile picture
    Gudrun Rapke-Brockert
    18 June 2025
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Efficient does not begin to describe Cyrus and his work. Based on relatives experiences and my own I can confidently say I know exactly who to turn to for all legal troubles. Thank you Cyrus, and Tabibnia Law Firm!!!
    Angel Aguirre profile picture
    Angel Aguirre
    14 June 2025
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    I had such a great experience working with Cyrus at Tabibnia Law Firm. He was proactive and attentive. He always got back to me regarding any queries or concerns. I felt very looked after and understood. He is fantastic at what he does.
    Deborah Buhaj profile picture
    Deborah Buhaj
    15 February 2025
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    I cannot say enough good things about my experience with Cyrus. Right out the gate, from my first interaction, Cyrus was attentive, empathetic and reassured me during a very stressful time for me and my partner. He showed kindness and humanity during one of the most stressful times of my life. Cyrus is knowledgeable, professional, prompt and readily available when I needed him. I could not be happier with my outcome. I highly recommend Cyrus Tabibnia.
    Edward Adrien Horner profile picture
    Edward Adrien Horner
    26 November 2024
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Shahrooz and I have worked jointly on some matters. He is a professional of the highest caliber who goes all in for his clients
    Mark Tseselsky profile picture
    Mark Tseselsky
    28 October 2024
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Cyrus was a wonderful attorney. I was referred to him by a family member, and it was a great decision to have him as my legal counsel. Throughout the 10 months that I dealt with my legal proceedings, Cyrus demonstrated his knowledge and expertise towards any questions or concerns I had, and answered them promptly whenever I had them. This reduced a lot of anxiety throughout the whole process and allowed me to continue my day to day without having to worry as much. Overall, I am very happy with the results of my legal proceedings. I would highly recommend this firm to anyone who is in need of a criminal defense attorney, as it is well worth it. Thanks Cyrus!
    Dion “Dion” Pham profile picture
    Dion “Dion” Pham
    4 October 2024
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    If you're looking for a lawyer who truly cares, Cyrus Tabibnia is your go-to person. Insightful and devoted no matter the case.
    Renato Detassis profile picture
    Renato Detassis
    9 September 2024
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    I would recommend this firm to my family and friends. Attorney Tabibnia, was extremely knowledgeable and kept me updated through out the length of my case. I was very please with the outcome and the professionalism the attorney had when speaking to me and very compassionate and understanding. I highly recommend him.
    Yessie Saggeth profile picture
    Yessie Saggeth
    15 August 2024
    Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
    Most amazing lawyer ever!!! Cyrus took great care of our situation, was really easy to talk to and was always just a phone call away! He fast tracked the process and got us exactly what we were asking for. I will 100% recommend him to everyone and anyone in any need of a solid lawyer!
    Brittany Alexander profile picture
    Brittany Alexander
    7 August 2024